Give labels to the ratings to improve consistency and open up the full rating range

Haha. Well, that was a quick demonstration.

Looking at the ratings here, many people might actually consider 3 to be “it was OK”. That’s actually another case for keeping it that way if labeled; possible consistency with existing ratings.

Thinking about it, I mainly want two things actually:

  • Having to think less about whether I’m internally consistent and what ratings mean.
  • More room for nuance in the positive ratings.

Originally I thought of the Goodreads labels because they open up a new positive rating space, but I think both could also be reached by e.g. the following labels:

  1. hated it
  2. didn’t like it
  3. it was OK
  4. really liked it (“liked it” feels a bit weak, tbh, but I’m not married to the exact wording)
  5. loved it

…and being able to set half-stars.

3 Likes