That is acting as a link, but it takes you nowhere when you are in the series page.
I tried it on my phone for 花ざかりの君たちへ 1 | L25 just now and it worked fine. Does it work for you now?
Ah it seems to be broken on the series page though
at least on my desktop.
Ohhh I misread OP. That makes sense. It’s originally an anchor link, and there’s nothing on the series page for it to jump to. ie vol 1 is https://learnnatively.com/book/10216a237b/#reviews.
When I hold down on the one on the series page, no url (not even #reviews) pops up. I guess it should link to vol 1 until series reviews exist? That might be a bit confusing to suddenly jump to a new page though ![]()
Ahhh true, hmmm. Maybe we should just have it as text without the link?
Mm personally I’d probably prefer it jumping to vol 1.
Is it possible for the series page to display the reviews from vol 1? Then it could stay on the same page
I think I’d like to keep things to their respective scopes, i.e. series reviews (when we have them) on the series page, and book reviews on the individual book pages. My proposal would be to add a “See reviews for vol. 1 ->” link that takes you to the first book in the series, rather than including the vol. 1 reviews on the page.
ETA: For me if I’m on a series page for a series I don’t know anything about, the next place I’d want to go is volume 1, so the jumping makes sense, but maybe that’s disruptive for different use-cases?
ETA 2: Ah, I misread @暁のルナ ‘s comment as saying you didn’t want it to jump, so I think actually we are on the same page there? ![]()
I would either remove the link style, or (if implemented) wait for an improved series page, which has series reviews/aggregate information? :
I hear you on keeping scope contained.
Yes, I would appreciate the jump. If doing it with the current text is an option, then I’d add “for vol. 1” to the current text, so the jump is implied.
Makes sense, but will be disappointing for the many books that have no reviews. So books with no reviews for vol 1 should have different text, like “No reviews for vol. 1 yet”.
Yeah, that’s a good point. Probably not too hard to check the review count from there (famous last words).
So do you mean that you’d prefer not having a link to the vol. 1 page?
I think the link would be somewhat miss-leading, as the reviews/score there is not exclusively for Vol. 1 right?
